-
1.
Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and cardiovascular disease: A meta-analysis.
Wen, W, Li, H, Wang, C, Chen, C, Tang, J, Zhou, M, Hong, X, Cheng, Y, Wu, Q, Zhang, X, et al
Frontiers in endocrinology. 2022;13:934225
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a multi-system disease that not only affects the structure and function of the liver but also increases the incidence of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease (CVD), cerebrovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease. In 2020, experts reached a consensus to recommend a more appropriate term to more accurately and positively define fatty liver disease associated with metabolic disorders, namely, metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of CVD incidence or CVD mortality in patients diagnosed with MAFLD. This study is a meta-analysis of ten cohort studies. Results show that patients in the MAFLD group had a significantly increased relative risk of CVD or death from CVD during the follow-up compared with the control group. Authors conclude that even though there is a positive association between MAFLD and the risk of CVD or death from CVD, further studies are needed to demonstrate different effects of the newly defined MAFLD on CVD compared with previous NAFLD.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease [MAFLD, formerly known as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)] is one of the most important causes of liver disease worldwide, while cardiovascular disease (CVD) is still one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and the two are closely related. This study aimed to investigate the risk of CVD incidence or CVD-related mortality (CVD mortality) in patients diagnosed with MAFLD under new concepts and new diagnostic criteria. METHODS We searched English databases PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library for relevant literature. The language was restricted to English. RESULTS By 22 January 2022, 556 published studies were obtained through preliminary retrieval, and 10 cohort studies were included in this study. All statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.2 software. Compared with the control group, patients in the MAFLD group had a significantly higher relative risk of CVD incidence or CVD mortality during the follow-up, with an RR rate of 1.95 (95% CI 1.76-2.17, p < 0.01). The incidence of CVD in the MAFLD group was more than twice that in the control group (RR 2.26, 95% CI 2.00-2.54, p < 0.01). The mortality rate of CVD was 1.57 times higher than that in the control group (RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.42-1.72, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Patients diagnosed with MAFLD alone had higher cardiovascular mortality than those diagnosed with NAFLD alone based on the available data.
-
2.
Efficacy of telemedicine for the management of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kuan, PX, Chan, WK, Fern Ying, DK, Rahman, MAA, Peariasamy, KM, Lai, NM, Mills, NL, Anand, A
The Lancet. Digital health. 2022;4(9):e676-e691
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Digital health interventions (DHIs) have the potential to transform the diagnosis, monitoring, and management of chronic cardiovascular conditions. Many DHIs are widely deployed in health systems across the world, with adoption rapidly increasing in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The aim of this study was to provide an updated synthesis of evidence on the effectiveness of telemedicine in the management of cardiovascular diseases. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of seventy-two studies with a total of 127,869 participants, of whom 82,818 (65%) were males and 45051 (35%) were females. Results showed reduced cardiovascular-related mortality and hospitalisation for patients with heart failure who received combined remote telemedicine monitoring and consultation compared with usual care. Authors conclude that the findings of their study suggest a definite role for telemedicine in the management of heart failure, particularly in early treatment optimisation, but the value is less clear for long-term management strategy and other cardiovascular diseases. Thus, future research should focus to address the application of these technologies to unselected populations and longer-term effectiveness.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telemedicine has been increasingly integrated into chronic disease management through remote patient monitoring and consultation, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting effectiveness of telemedicine interventions for the management of patients with cardiovascular conditions. METHODS In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library from database inception to Jan 18, 2021. We included randomised controlled trials and observational or cohort studies that evaluated the effects of a telemedicine intervention on cardiovascular outcomes for people either at risk (primary prevention) of cardiovascular disease or with established (secondary prevention) cardiovascular disease, and, for the meta-analysis, we included studies that evaluated the effects of a telemedicine intervention on cardiovascular outcomes and risk factors. We excluded studies if there was no clear telemedicine intervention described or if cardiovascular or risk factor outcomes were not clearly reported in relation to the intervention. Two reviewers independently assessed and extracted data from trials and observational and cohort studies using a standardised template. Our primary outcome was cardiovascular-related mortality. We evaluated study quality using Cochrane risk-of-bias and Newcastle-Ottawa scales. The systematic review and the meta-analysis protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021221010) and the Malaysian National Medical Research Register (NMRR-20-2471-57236). FINDINGS 72 studies, including 127 869 participants, met eligibility criteria, with 34 studies included in meta-analysis (n=13 269 with 6620 [50%] receiving telemedicine). Combined remote monitoring and consultation for patients with heart failure was associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular-related mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0·83 [95% CI 0·70 to 0·99]; p=0·036) and hospitalisation for a cardiovascular cause (0·71 [0·58 to 0·87]; p=0·0002), mostly in studies with short-term follow-up. There was no effect of telemedicine on all-cause hospitalisation (1·02 [0·94 to 1·10]; p=0·71) or mortality (0·90 [0·77 to 1·06]; p=0·23) in these groups, and no benefits were observed with remote consultation in isolation. Small reductions were observed for systolic blood pressure (mean difference -3·59 [95% CI -5·35 to -1·83] mm Hg; p<0·0001) by remote monitoring and consultation in secondary prevention populations. Small reductions were also observed in body-mass index (mean difference -0·38 [-0·66 to -0·11] kg/m2; p=0·0064) by remote consultation in primary prevention settings. INTERPRETATION Telemedicine including both remote disease monitoring and consultation might reduce short-term cardiovascular-related hospitalisation and mortality risk among patients with heart failure. Future research should evaluate the sustained effects of telemedicine interventions. FUNDING The British Heart Foundation.
-
3.
Mobile Apps to Improve Medication Adherence in Cardiovascular Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Al-Arkee, S, Mason, J, Lane, DA, Fabritz, L, Chua, W, Haque, MS, Jalal, Z
Journal of medical Internet research. 2021;23(5):e24190
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
A long-term use of cardiovascular medications significantly reduces the risk of morbidity and mortality, but their full therapeutic potential cannot be achieved if patients are nonadherent. Developing interventions to tackle medication nonadherence is important for improving health outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of app-based interventions on medication adherence in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study is a systemic review and meta-analysis of 16 randomised controlled trials. The apps used were all different for each study and were developed by different organizations: 8 were academic or government institutions, whereas others were commercial organizations. Results show that a total of 9 trials showed a statistically significant improvement in medication adherence in the intervention arm. Furthermore, the apps used had mixed functionality, including reminders, education or both, however, overall, user engagement and usability were rated positively, demonstrating interest in the concept. Authors conclude that it is difficult to make strong, unrestricted recommendations for practice, especially with the methodological limitations of the trials included in this study. However, mobile apps may enhance medication adherence as part of a package of care.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adherence rates of preventative medication for cardiovascular disease (CVD) have been reported as 57%, and approximately 9% of all CVD events in Europe are attributable to poor medication adherence. Mobile health technologies, particularly mobile apps, have the potential to improve medication adherence and clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to assess the effects of mobile health care apps on medication adherence and health-related outcomes in patients with CVD. This study also evaluates apps' functionality and usability and the involvement of health care professionals in their use. METHODS Electronic databases (MEDLINE [Ovid], PubMed Central, Cochrane Library, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO [Ovid], Embase [Ovid], and Google Scholar) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate app-based interventions aimed at improving medication adherence in patients with CVD. RCTs published in English from inception to January 2020 were reviewed. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed for clinical outcomes and medication adherence, with meta-regression analysis used to evaluate the impact of app intervention duration on medication adherence. RESULTS This study included 16 RCTs published within the last 6 years. In total, 12 RCTs reported medication adherence as the primary outcome, which is the most commonly self-reported adherence. The duration of the interventions ranged from 1 to 12 months, and sample sizes ranged from 24 to 412. Medication adherence rates showed statistically significant improvements in 9 RCTs when compared with the control, and meta-analysis of the 6 RCTs reporting continuous data showed a significant overall effect in favor of the app intervention (mean difference 0.90, 95% CI 0.03-1.78) with a high statistical heterogeneity (I2=93.32%). Moreover, 9 RCTs assessed clinical outcomes and reported an improvement in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in the intervention arm. Meta-analysis of these clinical outcomes from 6 RCTs favored app interventions, but none were significant. In the 7 trials evaluating app usability, all were found to be acceptable. There was a great variation in the app characteristics. A total of 10 RCTs involved health care professionals, mainly physicians and nurses, in the app-based interventions. The apps had mixed functionality: 2 used education, 7 delivered reminders, and 7 provided reminders in combination with educational support. CONCLUSIONS Apps tended to increase medication adherence, but interventions varied widely in design, content, and delivery. Apps have an acceptable degree of usability; yet the app characteristics conferring usability and effectiveness are ill-defined. Future large-scale studies should focus on identifying the essential active components of successful apps. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42019121385; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=121385.
-
4.
Comparison of dietary macronutrient patterns of 14 popular named dietary programmes for weight and cardiovascular risk factor reduction in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials.
Ge, L, Sadeghirad, B, Ball, GDC, da Costa, BR, Hitchcock, CL, Svendrovski, A, Kiflen, R, Quadri, K, Kwon, HY, Karamouzian, M, et al
BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2020;369:m696
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Dietary recommendations to combat obesity and its associated risk for heart disease are extensive. Many different diets and patterns of eating are being tried by millions of people, however no systematic review comparing their effectiveness has been performed. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of 14 popular diets and diets which restrict certain nutrients on weight loss and heart disease risk. The results identified 121 studies with 21942 patients for inclusion. The Atkins diet, the Zone diet and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet were the most effective for weight loss and for reducing blood pressure. Low carbohydrate and low-fat diets achieved similar weight loss when compared to a normal diet. Low carbohydrate diets had less effect on heart disease risk factors than low fat and moderate macronutrient diets. There were no improvements in good cholesterol with any of the diets. Interestingly any benefits on weight loss for any of the diets disappeared after 12 months and this was also observed for heart disease risk, except in those on the Mediterranean diet. It was concluded that most diets show improvements to weight loss and heart disease risk factors over 6 months, however these are largely unsustainable after 12 months. Differences between diets are small and healthcare practitioners could use this study to recommend any number of diets to achieve weight loss and the Mediterranean diet in particular to decrease heart disease risk. However, it is important to understand that this may be a short-term fix and at 12 months patients need to be assessed to ensure that weight loss is sustained.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the relative effectiveness of dietary macronutrient patterns and popular named diet programmes for weight loss and cardiovascular risk factor improvement among adults who are overweight or obese. DESIGN Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, and CENTRAL from database inception until September 2018, reference lists of eligible trials, and related reviews. STUDY SELECTION Randomised trials that enrolled adults (≥18 years) who were overweight (body mass index 25-29) or obese (≥30) to a popular named diet or an alternative diet. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Change in body weight, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and C reactive protein at the six and 12 month follow-up. REVIEW METHODS Two reviewers independently extracted data on study participants, interventions, and outcomes and assessed risk of bias, and the certainty of evidence using the GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation) approach. A bayesian framework informed a series of random effects network meta-analyses to estimate the relative effectiveness of the diets. RESULTS 121 eligible trials with 21 942 patients were included and reported on 14 named diets and three control diets. Compared with usual diet, low carbohydrate and low fat diets had a similar effect at six months on weight loss (4.63 v 4.37 kg, both moderate certainty) and reduction in systolic blood pressure (5.14 mm Hg, moderate certainty v 5.05 mm Hg, low certainty) and diastolic blood pressure (3.21 v 2.85 mm Hg, both low certainty). Moderate macronutrient diets resulted in slightly less weight loss and blood pressure reductions. Low carbohydrate diets had less effect than low fat diets and moderate macronutrient diets on reduction in LDL cholesterol (1.01 mg/dL, low certainty v 7.08 mg/dL, moderate certainty v 5.22 mg/dL, moderate certainty, respectively) but an increase in HDL cholesterol (2.31 mg/dL, low certainty), whereas low fat (-1.88 mg/dL, moderate certainty) and moderate macronutrient (-0.89 mg/dL, moderate certainty) did not. Among popular named diets, those with the largest effect on weight reduction and blood pressure in comparison with usual diet were Atkins (weight 5.5 kg, systolic blood pressure 5.1 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure 3.3 mm Hg), DASH (3.6 kg, 4.7 mm Hg, 2.9 mm Hg, respectively), and Zone (4.1 kg, 3.5 mm Hg, 2.3 mm Hg, respectively) at six months (all moderate certainty). No diets significantly improved levels of HDL cholesterol or C reactive protein at six months. Overall, weight loss diminished at 12 months among all macronutrient patterns and popular named diets, while the benefits for cardiovascular risk factors of all interventions, except the Mediterranean diet, essentially disappeared. CONCLUSIONS Moderate certainty evidence shows that most macronutrient diets, over six months, result in modest weight loss and substantial improvements in cardiovascular risk factors, particularly blood pressure. At 12 months the effects on weight reduction and improvements in cardiovascular risk factors largely disappear. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42015027929.
-
5.
Comorbid Chronic Diseases are Strongly Correlated with Disease Severity among COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Liu, H, Chen, S, Liu, M, Nie, H, Lu, H
Aging and disease. 2020;11(3):668-678
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Symptomatic COVID-19 infection is accompanied by a cluster of flu-like symptoms and life-threatening severe illnesses including acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute kidney injury, myocarditis, and organ failure. The aim of this study was to provide a systematic evaluation and detailed estimate on the prevalence and effects of pre-existing chronic conditions in COVID-19 patients. This study is a systemic review and meta-analysis of 24 studies (with a total of 10948 COVID-19 patients) for qualitative and quantitative synthesis. Results show that: - male participants were more susceptible to COVID-19. - both sexes exhibited clinical presentations similar in symptomatology. - diabetes and coronary artery disease/cardiovascular disease were prevalent in 10.0% and 8.0% of the patients, respectively. - pre-existing chronic diseases were strongly correlated with the increased disease severity and increased admittance to ICU. Authors conclude that patients with pre-existing chronic diseases may have a higher risk for developing severe COVID-19 and should be given close attention.
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has resulted in considerable morbidity and mortality worldwide since December 2019. In order to explore the effects of comorbid chronic diseases on clinical outcomes of COVID-19, a search was conducted in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CDC, and NIH databases to April 25, 2020. A total of 24 peer-reviewed articles, including 10948 COVID-19 cases were selected. We found diabetes was present in 10.0%, coronary artery disease/cardiovascular disease (CAD/CVD) was in 8.0%, and hypertension was in 20.0%, which were much higher than that of chronic pulmonary disease (3.0%). Specifically, preexisting chronic conditions are strongly correlated with disease severity [Odds ratio (OR) 3.50, 95% CI 1.78 to 6.90], and being admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) (OR 3.36, 95% CI 1.67 to 6.76); in addition, compared to COVID-19 patients with no preexisting chronic diseases, COVID-19 patients who present with either diabetes, hypertension, CAD/CVD, or chronic pulmonary disease have a higher risk of developing severe disease, with an OR of 2.61 (95% CI 1.93 to 3.52), 2.84 (95% CI 2.22 to 3.63), 4.18 (95% CI 2.87 to 6.09) and 3.83 (95% CI 2.15 to 6.80), respectively. Surprisingly, we found no correlation between chronic conditions and increased risk of mortality (OR 2.09, 95% CI 0.26 to16.67). Taken together, cardio-metabolic diseases, such as diabetes, hypertension and CAD/CVD were more common than chronic pulmonary disease in COVID-19 patients, however, each comorbid disease was correlated with increased disease severity. After active treatment, increased risk of mortality in patients with preexisting chronic diseases may reduce.
-
6.
Effect of Hesperidin on Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors: The Role of Intestinal Microbiota on Hesperidin Bioavailability.
Mas-Capdevila, A, Teichenne, J, Domenech-Coca, C, Caimari, A, Del Bas, JM, Escoté, X, Crescenti, A
Nutrients. 2020;12(5)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) cause around 31% of all deaths worldwide. Certain dietary patterns have been associated with a reduction in CVDs and so the use of natural-based products has gained importance as a preventive strategy. Hesperidin is a bioactive compound found in high levels in citrus fruits. The reported beneficial properties include antitumor, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory; cholesterol and glucose lowering effects. Many animal studies show multiple beneficial effects but are inconclusive in human studies. The aim of this review is to describe the effects of hesperidin on CVD factors and to highlight the individual differences in its bioavailability and effectiveness. The gut bacteria play an important role in this. Hesperidin is not broken down by the normal digestive process and reaches the colon largely intact. It is the job of the gut bacteria to break it down into bioavailable substances that can be absorbed and utilised. The discrepancies observed in some of the results from human clinical trials may be partly due to individual differences, including that of the gut bacteria. Further clinical trials should be considered as well as classifying individuals according to individual differences in metabotypes.
Abstract
Recently, hesperidin, a flavonone mainly present in citrus fruits, has emerged as a new potential therapeutic agent able to modulate several cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) risk factors. Animal and in vitro studies demonstrate beneficial effects of hesperidin and its derived compounds on CVD risk factors. Thus, hesperidin has shown glucose-lowering and anti-inflammatory properties in diabetic models, dyslipidemia-, atherosclerosis-, and obesity-preventing effects in CVDs and obese models, and antihypertensive and antioxidant effects in hypertensive models. However, there is still controversy about whether hesperidin could contribute to ameliorate glucose homeostasis, lipid profile, adiposity, and blood pressure in humans, as evidenced by several clinical trials reporting no effects of treatments with this flavanone or with orange juice on these cardiovascular parameters. In this review, we focus on hesperidin's beneficial effects on CVD risk factors, paying special attention to the high interindividual variability in response to hesperidin-based acute and chronic interventions, which can be partly attributed to differences in gut microbiota. Based on the current evidence, we suggest that some of hesperidin's contradictory effects in human trials are partly due to the interindividual hesperidin variability in its bioavailability, which in turn is highly dependent on the α-rhamnosidase activity and gut microbiota composition.
-
7.
Systematic review of COVID-19 in children shows milder cases and a better prognosis than adults.
Ludvigsson, JF
Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992). 2020;109(6):1088-1095
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which was also previously known as 2019-nCoV. This study is a systematic literature review which summarises the findings on the current knowledge of COVID-19 in children. The review includes 45 scientific papers and letters. Results showed that children have so far accounted for 1%-5% of diagnosed cases. Children often are asymptomatic, have milder disease than adults, and deaths have been extremely rare. Diagnostic findings have been similar to adults, with fever and respiratory symptoms being prevalent. Authors conclude that the disease course in paediatric COVID-19 was milder than in adults, children had a better prognosis and deaths were extremely rare.
Abstract
AIM: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected hundreds of thousands of people. Data on symptoms and prognosis in children are rare. METHODS A systematic literature review was carried out to identify papers on COVID-19, which is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), using the MEDLINE and Embase databases between January 1 and March 18, 2020. RESULTS The search identified 45 relevant scientific papers and letters. The review showed that children have so far accounted for 1%-5% of diagnosed COVID-19 cases, they often have milder disease than adults and deaths have been extremely rare. Diagnostic findings have been similar to adults, with fever and respiratory symptoms being prevalent, but fewer children seem to have developed severe pneumonia. Elevated inflammatory markers were less common in children, and lymphocytopenia seemed rare. Newborn infants have developed symptomatic COVID-19, but evidence of vertical intrauterine transmission was scarce. Suggested treatment included providing oxygen, inhalations, nutritional support and maintaining fluids and electrolyte balances. CONCLUSIONS The coronavirus disease 2019 has occurred in children, but they seemed to have a milder disease course and better prognosis than adults. Deaths were extremely rare.